Access Nested Data with Reacts props.children

Share this video with your friends

Send Tweet

When you're building your React components, you'll probably want to access child properties of the markup. this.props.children accesses the innerHTML or nested components of another component.

Ryan
Ryan
~ 10 years ago

HI I was having trouble using the React.renderComponent( ) method from the example, and it looks like the React team has changed the method that you should use in this case from React.renderComponent() to React.render()......https://medium.com/@_jh3y/adopting-change-with-react-v0-12-1d9625e27535

Leonard
Leonard
~ 10 years ago

I ran into the same issue Ryan and needed to swap out the script files: http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/0.13.1/react.min.js

https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/0.13.1/JSXTransformer.js

Ryan
Ryan
~ 10 years ago

Hey how did you use the emmet like syntax when typing the span.glyphicon... and have webstorm know to use className instead of class (JSX vs HTML) ?

Ryan
Ryan
~ 10 years ago

Hey how did you use the emmet like syntax when typing the span.glyphicon... and have webstorm know to use className instead of class (JSX vs HTML) ?

Kevin
Kevin
~ 9 years ago

How do I setup bootstrap in my app? The video didn't show this...

Joe Maddalone
Joe Maddalone(instructor)
~ 9 years ago

Just add <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.5/css/bootstrap.min.css"> to your index.html.

Somsubhra  Ghosh
Somsubhra Ghosh
~ 9 years ago

Really Nice Video..Have been enjoying the series

Also found that the Button could be created in a functional(presentational) way

const Button = (props) => <button>{props.children}</button>
Olga
Olga
~ 8 years ago

I'm still having trouble understanding this.props.children. When adding {this.props.children} to the child component, why doesn't it render a second button with the parent's information ?So in total there would be two buttons. I know my logic is wrong, but can someone tell me why this isn't the case ?

Kirk Sefchik
Kirk Sefchik
~ 8 years ago

I'm still having trouble understanding this.props.children. When adding {this.props.children} to the child component, why doesn't it render a second button with the parent's information ?So in total there would be two buttons. I know my logic is wrong, but can someone tell me why this isn't the case ?

I think I understand where you're coming from. The nomenclature here is very confusing -- it tripped me up as well. this in the Button class is indeed referring to Button (not <button> directly, but by extension). Whenever you pass something into the inner HTML of a component, it's populated in [child].props.children. If you install React Dev Tools for your browser (or console.dir(this) inside Button.render() { ... } ...), you can see that Button.children is an array composed of 3 "children" passed to it by the App component: "I ", <Heart/> and " React". I know, silly right? They need to come up with a better name for this -- I don't know why they couldn't just call it [child].props.innerHTML. Regardless, I think that answers your question. :D

Eleonora Lester
Eleonora Lester
~ 7 years ago

It would be really cool to have more real-life examples of these vids. Thanks!

Zone Chen
Zone Chen
~ 6 years ago

I have the same Question with Olga.Thanks for Kirk;s answer.

I thought using props.children is to produce nest component structure with JSX.

// use props.children >> can setup structure in JSX
const HeartButton = (props) => <button>{props.children}</button>
const HeartImg = ()=><span>&hearts;</span>

<HeartButton>
   <HeartImg/>
</HeartButton>

<HeartButton>
   <HeartImg/>
   <HeartImg/>
</HeartButton>

// no need to modify component code

//without props.children >> need to setup the structure in code
const HeartImg = ()=><span>&hearts;</span>
const HeartButton = (props) => <button><HeartImg /></button>

<HeartButton />
// need to edit component to get more heart, or need to produce another component: OneHeartButton, TwoHeartButton ...

don't know that whether my understanding is right ?